![]() ![]() From the bin folder you can start gmsh by typing. Navigate to the bin folder: cd /gmsh-3.0.6-Linu圆4/bin. ![]() P.S.: Since I didn't write it anywhere else: I used Gmsh 4.3. Unzip gmsh: tar -xvzf gmsh-3.0.6-Linu圆4.tgz (or whatever version you've downloaded) This makes a folder gmsh-3.0.6-Linu圆4 containing gmsh which is portable. It seems that the command parser from gmsh parses line-wise only until it encounters the first semicolon. geo-file with explicit linebreaks (\n between the commands). The same happend when I wrote everything manually in one line directly in the. geo-file in one line (so the echo command from above just without the linebreaks). I also tried to write all the commands in the. Gmsh seems to only execute the first of the three commands (the merge command) and ignores the rest. Up until now I have: gmsh input.stl -string "Surface Loop(2)= " -3 -o $cwd/MSH/slice$a.$i.msh -format "msh22" Therefore I created a script which uses command line arguments to do the above and avoids opening the gui. stl-files I can't do it manually with the gui. Since I have to do this process for multiple hundreds of. Modules->Geometry->Elementary entities->Add->Volume->klick on the surface-mesh->pressing 'e'->pressing 'q') I know that I therefore need to add a volume to the surfaces from the STL file. ![]() The problem I have is that I need to convert STL files to mesh files. Print('Adding to binaries'.After long hours of searching for an answer I thought it might be better to ask the community. Libpath = Path(gmsh._file_).parent / libname # get the location of the gmsh dll which sits next to the gmsh.py file You could make this more generic by filtering all *.dll in the gmsh directory, but I've hardcoded for clarity: # -*- mode: python coding: utf-8 -*. spec file which dynamically locates the gmsh-4.9.dll at the time of compile so it picks up the right. spec file to point the compiler to the gmsh-4.9.dll. You can use the binaries input of the pyinstaller. dll library called gmsh-4.9.dll for Windows OS. If you look in the gmsh.py source, you can see that gmsh.py loads up a. Since you're seeing a dynlib/dll loading error when you run the compiled python script, this suggests that pyinstaller isn't finding the gmsh library during compile and hence it is missing from the executable. There's some description of how pyinstaller does this in the docs. It's difficult for pyinstaller to consistently find these libraries since they're not accessed in the same way as normal python imports, they are loaded using the cytpes package. So it's essential that these libraries are embedded in the pyinstaller output for your code to function as it does when you run it directly through the python interpreter. When you import gmsh.py into your script then gmsh loads these libraries in the background giving you access to their functionality through python methods. The gmsh python package wraps a bunch of compiled libraries which contain the implementations of the methods you call from python. spec file, for use with pyinstaller if so! Has anybody tried to compile some Python code that imports the gmsh package? I'd really appreciate an example. Failed to execute script run-jointbuilder Most probably this dynlib/dll was not found when the application was frozen. 'C:\\Users\\willber\\Anaconda3\\Scripts\\gmsh'. I then get this error: _main_.PyInstallerImportError: Failed to load dynlib/dll Try using the full path with constructor syntax. When using pyinstaller to compile my code, it appears to be successful, but then when I try to run the executable I get the following errors: import gmsh # PyInstaller PYZ\įile "PyInstaller\loader\pyiboot01_bootstrap.py", line 144, in _init_įile "ctypes\_init_.py", line 381, in _init_\įileNotFoundError: Could not find module 'C:\Users\willber\Anaconda3\Scripts\gmsh' (or one of its dependencies). The script name is called "run-jointbuilder.py" The package has a number of dependancies (such as numpy), but importantly gmsh. I'm trying to package up my Python package into an executable using pyinstaller. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |